oh well.
there's gonna be some new course coming up.
some chinese course that "borrows" fms's equipment.
its chinese media and communications.
and i think its a BAD idea.
this's 1 argument against it thats wrong, firsthand.
In addition, CMC is almost a replica of MCM, except that it is taught in Mandarin. Isn’t CMC redundant since Mass Communications students can do a Presentation in Chinese elective in their third year?
look.
i'm doing a book writing elective next semester. but that doesnt make me hemmingway.
i hope people understand this.
anyway, its really ridiculous to have this new course.
fms cannot already support yet another course using our equipment.
already, our equipment is out dated, over used and not in top condition.
there's not enough equipment and too many idiots borrowing them.
the TSO's taking care of the equipment are overworked and thus the equipment is often not in top condition.
oh yah.
you know why the TSO's are overworked?
there's this stupid chapman uni thing coming in soon.
and there's a proposal about a proposed ibp conglomerate.
yep.
in these all the lecturers are trying to push their own agenda without caring about what their decisions would actually do.
about the proposed conglomerate.
i feel it is a bad idea.
i understand the need to have the various IBPs working together.
then we can like help each other out.
but the thing is, we only want help when it is required.
i feel that the idea of a conglomerate will encourage reliance on others and reduce creative freedom.
for EXAMPLE, if the label decided to promote a punk band, having to work with external designers (within the conglomerate) would add an extra element of unfamiliarity.
the designers would likely not be familiar with their style.
extend this to an entire marketing team.
now imagine black flag being marketed like simple plan, because they're "both punk" from the marketing team's perspective.
and anyway, the way lecturers try to push their own agendas?
that fucking sickens me.
i recall a certain bald guy (who froths at the mouth when he talks too much)
yapping at the heels of a certain mabel
funny how 1 promotion can turn people into mental slaves.
ao anyway, i find the very idea ridiculous.
yes, the chinese media industry may be emerging in the long run.
yet that will make chs redundant, no?
i feel they should just revise the syllabus of chs.
not create 1 more course.
anyway, tell me honestly.
are you sick of china people?
cont'd in next post i guess.
Hangar 18- Megadeth
Military intelligence
Two words combined that cant make sense
there's gonna be some new course coming up.
some chinese course that "borrows" fms's equipment.
its chinese media and communications.
and i think its a BAD idea.
this's 1 argument against it thats wrong, firsthand.
In addition, CMC is almost a replica of MCM, except that it is taught in Mandarin. Isn’t CMC redundant since Mass Communications students can do a Presentation in Chinese elective in their third year?
look.
i'm doing a book writing elective next semester. but that doesnt make me hemmingway.
i hope people understand this.
anyway, its really ridiculous to have this new course.
fms cannot already support yet another course using our equipment.
already, our equipment is out dated, over used and not in top condition.
there's not enough equipment and too many idiots borrowing them.
the TSO's taking care of the equipment are overworked and thus the equipment is often not in top condition.
oh yah.
you know why the TSO's are overworked?
there's this stupid chapman uni thing coming in soon.
and there's a proposal about a proposed ibp conglomerate.
yep.
in these all the lecturers are trying to push their own agenda without caring about what their decisions would actually do.
about the proposed conglomerate.
i feel it is a bad idea.
i understand the need to have the various IBPs working together.
then we can like help each other out.
but the thing is, we only want help when it is required.
i feel that the idea of a conglomerate will encourage reliance on others and reduce creative freedom.
for EXAMPLE, if the label decided to promote a punk band, having to work with external designers (within the conglomerate) would add an extra element of unfamiliarity.
the designers would likely not be familiar with their style.
extend this to an entire marketing team.
now imagine black flag being marketed like simple plan, because they're "both punk" from the marketing team's perspective.
and anyway, the way lecturers try to push their own agendas?
that fucking sickens me.
i recall a certain bald guy (who froths at the mouth when he talks too much)
yapping at the heels of a certain mabel
funny how 1 promotion can turn people into mental slaves.
ao anyway, i find the very idea ridiculous.
yes, the chinese media industry may be emerging in the long run.
yet that will make chs redundant, no?
i feel they should just revise the syllabus of chs.
not create 1 more course.
anyway, tell me honestly.
are you sick of china people?
cont'd in next post i guess.
Hangar 18- Megadeth
Military intelligence
Two words combined that cant make sense
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home