On the new zodiac signs.
If you think your zodiac sign has changed due to variations in the earth's alignment caused by the cumulative effect of the moon's gravitational pull over the years...
You obviously have no understanding of astrology beyond what you have read in the pages of shitty tabloid and popular mainstream magazines.
You see, your astrological sign is dependent upon the dominant constellation in the sky at the time of your birth, not at the present moment. Your constellation is akin to a "guardian angel" assigned to you at the time of your birth.
So this means your astrological readings will fall under your original astrological sign, BUT you probably need a better reading than one in a magazine in the newspaper. This is mainly because of the new astrological sign's influence on current events, be it benevolent or malevolent.
Astrological readings in magazines or newspapers were never accurate anyway, nor were they meant to be.
And besides, astrology requires much more than the date of your birth or the dominant constellation. To be truly accurate, you need to know the relative positions of the other stars AND planets in the sky. Counting pluto and charon, of course. So if you don't already know those, don't bother. Astrology is and never was meant to be 100% accurate anyway, so just take it as harmless entertainment.
At Giza- Om
You obviously have no understanding of astrology beyond what you have read in the pages of shitty tabloid and popular mainstream magazines.
You see, your astrological sign is dependent upon the dominant constellation in the sky at the time of your birth, not at the present moment. Your constellation is akin to a "guardian angel" assigned to you at the time of your birth.
So this means your astrological readings will fall under your original astrological sign, BUT you probably need a better reading than one in a magazine in the newspaper. This is mainly because of the new astrological sign's influence on current events, be it benevolent or malevolent.
Astrological readings in magazines or newspapers were never accurate anyway, nor were they meant to be.
And besides, astrology requires much more than the date of your birth or the dominant constellation. To be truly accurate, you need to know the relative positions of the other stars AND planets in the sky. Counting pluto and charon, of course. So if you don't already know those, don't bother. Astrology is and never was meant to be 100% accurate anyway, so just take it as harmless entertainment.
Rise aviator - sun will follow.
Aperture on door the wave form school.
Sentient ground of the light shrine shining.
Aperture on door the lind-hymn stone.
Sentient ground of the light shrine shining.
Aperture of door the lind-hymn stone.
The orbits arms oscillate to freedom.
Params the shore of celestial sea.
At Giza- Om
posted by D. Munky at
16:40
0 Comments
